Daylight Savings and the Market, from Victor Niederhoffer
Here's an interesting article saying that daylight savings time is bearish because it's disruptive. I believe the study should be generalized to all disruptive events.
Jordan Low asks:
But what about this article saying the opposite? Which article is correct?
Vic Niederhoffer continues:
That's the point. Daylight savings time comes too rarely for a scientific study to be based on it, and there are too many comparable events that occur once or twice a year. Or perhaps I don't get the joke?
Bruno Ombreux writes:
I cannot think of anything more disruptive than the dreaded EFA calendar in the UK power market. You may want to study its impact on spark spreads and UK-continent spreads.
Also, their days run from 23:00 to 23:00 instead of 24:00 to 24:00 like everywhere else in the World.